PLOTS FOR SALE ...IN PRIME LOCATIONS IN MUMBAI.

KHAR, BANDRA , SHAHSTRI NAGAR (SANTACRUZ) and more.....
All the plots are in the prime location in mumbai and measuring minimum 597.21 sqr mtrs.
A plot in Khar west measuring 597.21 square mtrs just just for 3,10,14000/- (three crores ten lakhs fourteen thousand only.) Where a flat mesuring 1000 square feet of built up area is for approx minimum minimu 1.5 crores ( one crore fifty lakhs) and the plot of 6428.314 square feet.
On a plot of 6428.314 square meters minimum 20 flats measuring 1000 plus area can be constructed and the with an additional FSI purchase from the market, and each flat is sold for minimum 1.5 crores, this is the minimum price one can buy the flat at, which actually is false there is no flat in khar (w) measuring 1000 sq ft avialable for 1.5 crores, the price is more then 1.5 for sure in the area I am talking of (7th road Khar west, mumbai-52).
But the plot is definately valued at 3,10,14000/- (three crores ten laks fourteen thousand only) just to save the stamp duty by the builders which actually is the loss to the state.
This is not just 1 case in the above mentioned plots, the value is under estimated just to save the stamp duty....what are the stamp duty officials doing about this...
Is any body listening......?

EVEN GOD CAN'T HELP INDIA...SUPREME COURT

"In India , even GOD cannot help. He will be a silent spectator as He will also feel helpless."



This remark represnted the SC' s (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) frustration over its failure into goading goverment to amend laws to treat squatting goverment premises as criminal trespass of public property-an offence which may attract arrest. (Times Of India 6th August 08 Mumbai)

The Supreme court on Tuesday slammed the Centre for its refusal to amend the law for evecting illegal occupants in goverment flats.

In short the story goes as the MLA etc the so called politicians dont wanna vacate their houses alloted to them for their term, but they want us to bow down to builders and give away our homes built with our love and effection.

Now one can really understand...when they (the politicians) say they want to change MUMBAI into SHANGHAI, its not the infrastrusture they are talking about, but the they want to change it politically.

Shanghai is an communist, and they want MUMBAI to be communist too.

For these politicians D-E-M-O-C-R-A-C-Y means....demo (demonstration) of communism.

TERROR OF 70-30

Its quite suprising that India is soft target for cross border terrorism, when the fact is we cant even fight the in house terrorism and the handle is given by none other but the MUMBAI HIGH COURT, the LAND MARK ORDER which says minority cant stall the revamp of the CHS., and the MHADA is come out with 70-30 game , which according to MHADA means that if in a MHADA housing societies 70% have given their consent to the devloper for the redvelopment of their bank balances ooopppsss redevlopment of the society building then the 30% have no say in this but to bow down.

What is this 70-30 game?
The 70% of the profit made from the redevlopment goes to the builder and the 30% to the so called bow bow cats...I mean the bureaucrats.The worst game the builders are playing is that they are draging the individuals who oppose the redevlopment to the HIGH COURT and from high court the builders get eviction order.
In one such case a Dr. Karandes clinic in DN Nagar was rampaged just because he didnt give consent to the builder and the eviction order was passed by the high court, whole of his newly constructed clinic is now become like a graveyard.....seeing is believing so pictures are attached.
In this case out of 40 members 28 are oppossing and the builder involved here is VAIDEHI AKASH HOUSING PVT LTD. and is funded by RUSTOMJEE of KEYSTONE.

IS THIS NOT TERRORISM.....? Though its not a blast but yet a DOCTORS clinic is rampaged for personal gains of the builder.

Who is to be blamed....?

ARRE RUKHJAAAA RE BANDEH....ARREE THAM JAAA RE BHANDEH...
KE KUDRAT HASH PADEHGI.....

HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT IN INDIA

The Judgement below passed in the favor of the builder by the Honerable High Court Judge Mr. Khanvilkar on 31st August 07, Mumbai, leaving the flat owners with no option but to give their flats to the builders.

All said and done, but have you ever heard of a case like this...the society members sign a redevlopment agreement with Raja builders, the IOD and the required permissions etc from the official departments of mumbai is given to Raja builders, but the suit in the High court filled against the 2 members who have not given their consent to the builder is filed by Raja constructions...which is a 3rd party, and the high court order is passed in the favor of Raja constructions, when we in the appeal raise this point in front of the High division bench (which consist of 2 learned judges) they say SO WHAT??????

The builder in the petition filed in front of a Sngle learned judge Mr. Kahnvilkar, says that the buildingis in dilapidated condition and a slab on 2nd floor of the building has alraedy collapsed ( which actually is false).

Now...how can a High Court Honerable Judge Mr. Khanvilkar pass a judgement without getting the building structure surveyed from a BMC authorised structual engineer.

Please read the part of the judgement copy and also what activist and lawyers say on such a harsh judgement and leave your comments


Times of India, Mumbai, dtd 14 Sep 07

Minority can’t stall building revamp: Court

Says Dissenting Flat Owners Can Be Evicted

Cops can be used to evict flat owners: High court


Judgement by High Court Justice Khanvilkar that flat owners opposing the redevelopment, Will have to evict the flats...builders can do with the help of police....here the minorities are on target.

Hon arable Justice Khanvilkar gave this judgement which is not in the books of law.Minorities (the 2 members of the said SAHARA CHS, 7Th road khar west mumbai India) are not against the redevelopment but they are against the Raja builders who's not a reputed builder in Mumbai.....The high court verdict is favour of the builders in Mumbai, that means they can use this verdict even if 7 members out of 12 of the society are ready to go with the builders.The office bearers of the same sahara society had never ever called tenders, the said society is not caved from any angle....IS Honorable High Court Judge Mr. Khanvilkar trying to prove here....

that being a democratic country...the rule by the by the HIGH COURT....of the builders and for aam junta...(common man)Deconstructing the Debate

Order On Overruling Minority View In Hsg Socs May Speed Up Redevelopment But Raises Concerns About Individual Rights

TIMES NEWS NETWORK (15Th Sep 07)
Mumbai: The Bombay high court order which overruled the rights of a minority in a Khar housing society while deciding on the issue of redevelopment, could have serious implications, say experts.

“How can flat owners be forcibly thrown out of their own flats? How can the proprietary right in property be denied in the absence of a specific law?’’ asked property lawyer Mulraj Shah. “It can’t be done, unless there is a provision in law, and currently there is no such legal provision,’’ he said.

Chandrashekhar Prabhu, architect and housing expert, too said the issue is not just of majority versus a minuscule minority. The issue cannot be seen from the point of view of Numbers as there are some fundamental issues involved. If I am a member of a cooperative housing society, I am not only the owner of the flat where I am staying but also part owner of the land on which the society building is located. That gives me certain basic rights to decide which is the best option available to me for redevelopment. And it should also be the best option available to all and not just on the basis of a MAJORITY DECISION.

“I think the court’s concern for development is understood. But we should also understand that some of the office bearers of the societies are bought over by the developer and the rest of the society members are not left with much option but to go to the court.’’

Solicitor Keerit Shah said the high court order could give a handle to builders to harass hapless flat-owners.

Its sad that builders are using the same order copy, which actualy is not the judgement and threatening the so called minorities opposing the redevelopment for genuine reasons...

The committee members of various CHS., are easily managed, no tenders are floated, nor do they maintain any transparency.

When the Times of India reporter Archana Sharma contacted the secretary Mr. Tulsi Lalwani of Sahara CHS., he refused to comment leaving it on the builder Narendra Bhatia of Raja Construction Company to comment.

The judgement giving an handle to the builders as the Lawyer Keerit Shah said,(I was requested by Mr Alfanso to remove his case details about bandra boon society as his matter is settled so edited the details on 9th June 2012)

Mrs Meena Gonsalves and 40 members of the same colony NEW DN. NAGAR Andheri west, builder involved here is AAKASH VEIDHI with RUSTOMJEE of KEY STONE.

Is there any end to the greed of the land sharks???